Grenada defers the 30-day residence requirement by circular

Rows of record drawers in an archive. Grenada deferred the 30-day residence requirement by circular, not by amending the law — illustration.
An agency circular suspends the residence obligation until two undated conditions are met — and the 31 August start date it names appears in no gazette, Act or order this desk could find.
The Investment Migration Agency Grenada published Circular No. 2 of 2026 on 21 August 2026. It tells the market that the residence requirement and the other obligations arising under the regional framework will not take effect until two conditions are met, and in doing so it names a commencement date of 31 August 2026 that appears in none of the records this desk searched.
The obligation it defers belongs to the regional regulator that was enacted without a published start date. What follows covers the circular itself: what it suspends, what it leaves undated, and where the public record stops.
The agency names 31 August, then makes the requirement conditional
The Investment Migration Agency Grenada published Circular No. 2 of 2026, headed “Operationalization of the Regional Agreement and Commencement of Residence Requirements” and signed by its chief executive, Thomas Anthony. It opens by placing itself inside the regional framework: “The Investment Migration Agency Grenada (IMA Grenada) wishes to advise that, as part of Grenada’s obligations arising under the Eastern Caribbean Citizenship by Investment Regulatory Authority Agreement and the related amendments adopted in 2025 and 2026, clarification is being provided regarding the implementation and commencement of the requirements arising thereunder.”
The paragraph that follows is the one that matters: “Notwithstanding the recent amendment concerning the residence requirement, which is scheduled to commence on August 31, 2026, the implementation of the residence requirement, together with the other obligations and requirements arising under the regional framework, will not take effect until the relevant regional regulator has been operationalized and all participating Member States have formally agreed upon and communicated an effective commencement date.”
Two conditions, and the circular treats them as cumulative: the regional regulator must be operational, and all five participating states must both agree an effective commencement date and communicate it. Neither carries a date of its own. The agency undertakes to issue further guidance once both are satisfied, and encourages all stakeholders to await further official communication from it about commencement.
What the circular does not do is say which residence requirement it means. It gives no figure, cites no provision and names no statute. The obligation described above comes from Article 48 of the agreement — 30 days in aggregate across the first five calendar years after the grant, with each person required to be present for at least five days in the first twelve months — and the amendment bill reproduces those same figures in national law, in the section 7A it would insert. The circular refers to neither.
Its date needs a word, because the file was uploaded under a name that disagrees with it. The dateline in the document reads 21 August 2026, the agency’s own media listing gives the same day, and so does the file’s creation timestamp; the file name reads 19 August. This update follows the dateline.
No commencement order appears in the records searched
Grenada’s Government Gazette was read in full for the whole period from the Senate debate to the circular: issues 35 to 39 of Volume 144, covering 31 July to 21 August 2026 and including the extraordinary issue of 12 August. The words “citizenship”, “investment” and “ECCIRA” appear in none of the five. The subsidiary instruments circulated with them run from Statutory Rule and Order No. 13 to No. 19 of 2026 and concern petroleum, central bank schedules, customs, petrol prices and value added tax; no commencement order under clause 1(2) appears in that sequence. The government’s list of Acts of 2026 runs to five — drug control, trademarks, banking, the CARICOM arrest warrant, domestic violence — and carries no Citizenship by Investment (Amendment) Act.
Set those searches beside the circular and the position is narrower than the announcement first suggests. Across the gazette issues named, the published Acts index and the agency’s own document archive, the circular is the only document this desk located that mentions 31 August 2026 at all. It does not identify the instrument that fixed that date: no Act, section, order or gazette reference appears in its text. It refers to an amendment as already adopted, and no Citizenship by Investment (Amendment) Act of 2026 appears in those same records. The searched record does not explain that discrepancy, and the parliamentary pages that might have narrowed it returned errors when opened.
The document itself is styled as a circular. It cites no statutory power, and it identifies no instrument establishing 31 August 2026.
The notice does not resolve treatment of pending applications
The circular says nothing about applications already lodged. It does not mention transitional guidelines, and it does not mention the ministerial discretion in the proposed section 7A(6), which would allow the residency provisions to be applied retroactively to pending applications.
That silence is where the practical exposure sits. Section 7A(6) does two separate things. It applies the residency provisions to applications submitted on or after the ECCIRA Agreement Act comes into force. Separately, it permits those provisions to be applied retroactively to applications already pending, at the Minister’s discretion and subject to transitional guidelines. The circular speaks to the implementation of the requirement rather than to the commencement of that Act, and no document located connects the two. No transitional guidelines were found in the agency’s archive, in the gazette issues searched or in the Acts index.
An investor with a file open in Grenada therefore has two things: an agency statement that the requirement is not being implemented, and a proposed provision under which a pending file could later be drawn into it by ministerial decision rather than by its filing date. What no located document supplies is how that discretion would be exercised, or against which files.
Two records would settle the commencement question. The further guidance the agency has undertaken to issue once the regional regulator is operational and the five states have agreed and communicated a date had not appeared in the agency archive by 29 August 2026. A direct review of gazette issues published through 21 August 2026 found no commencement order. The pending-file question depends on the transitional guidelines contemplated by section 7A(6). Those guidelines have not been published, and the record does not show whether they would form part of the agency’s further guidance or appear separately. On the circular’s own test the next guidance needs all five states to move together, and no equivalent notice was found from the citizenship units of Dominica, Antigua and Barbuda or Saint Kitts and Nevis. Saint Lucia’s news page returned an error and was not checked.
Read this article in Vietnamese
The Legation Times writes its content from published documents; nothing here is legal, tax or investment advice. Spotted an error? Send a correction request; for content rights, send a takedown request.