28 Jul 2026 · Vietnam VI

Citizenship · Capital · Global Mobility

The Legation Times

Citizenship by Descent: An Often-Overlooked Route

Citizenship by Descent: An Often-Overlooked Route

Citizenship by descent allows citizenship to be obtained through family origin, without investment. Analyze the jus sanguinis principle, generation limits and what needs to be verified.

Fact Table

Verified Claim Source
Nationality by family connection is governed by national law and documentary evidence. 1
An official example showing that descent claims depend on the family chain, registration rules and supporting records. 2

What is nationality by descent?

Citizenship by descent, in international law often called the principle of jus sanguinis — rights by blood, is a mechanism for conferring nationality based on the nationality of parents or ancestors, rather than on the basis of birth. A person can hold the nationality of a country they have never visited, simply because the blood relationship is recognized by that country's law.

What makes this category interesting to groups considering a second passport is its nature: This is not a program designed to attract capital, but rather a recognition of a status that already exists. Therefore, it often does not include an investment, and is also less subject to political pressure than investment-based programs.

Two fundamental principles: Bloodline and birthplace

Most citizenship systems around the world combine the two principles. Jus soli grants citizenship by place of birth, common in the Americas. Jus sanguinis grants citizenship by descent, which is the basis of much of the European and Asian systems. Very few countries apply purely one principle; What is common is a country-specific mixing ratio.

For readers, the practical consequence is that nationality by blood can exist side by side with nationality of birth without even knowing it. A person born and raised in one country may still be a legal citizen of another country according to that country's laws, just without having gone through the recording procedures.

Generation limits and accompanying conditions

The decisive point in any citizenship application by descent is how many generations the country can trace back. Some countries only recognize the parents; Others allow tracing back to grandparents or beyond, sometimes for an unlimited number of generations as long as the chain of connection is not broken. It is this boundary that separates qualifying applications from non-eligible applications.

In addition to generational limits, the law often includes additional conditions that are easy to overlook: Whether the ancestor acquired citizenship in another country before the child was born, whether the maternal or paternal lineage was treated the same at the respective historical period, and whether there were language or registration requirements within a certain time frame. These conditions vary by legislature and have been tightened in some countries in recent years.

Civil status records are the real bottleneck

In fact, the hardest part of citizenship by descent is rarely a legal question, but rather a question of evidence. The records require a continuous series of civil status documents — birth, marriage, death — for each link in the bloodline, often issued decades ago, in different archives, sometimes in places that have changed names or ownership.

Each foreign document must usually be consularly legalized or certified under an equivalent mechanism, then translated by an accredited translator. A small difference in the spelling of names or dates between two documents is enough to cause the documents to be returned for correction. This is why records of this type are often measured in years, not months.

Putting it next to the investment aspect: What's the difference?

Compared to citizenship by investment, the blood stream has clear advantages in cost and durability. There is no capital threshold to commit, and because status is recognized and not sold, it is less of an issue when countries review visa exemption policies. In turn, it is not at all an option that can be actively created: Either you readers have a qualifying blood connection, or you don't.

The time factor is also reversed. The investment has a relatively predictable roadmap because it is designed to operate according to the process; Consanguinity status depends on the record keeping status and processing capacity of the receiving agency, which can be a long backlog. For families that need a solution within a specific time frame, this is a difference that needs serious consideration.

Verification and consultation

Because the condition of nationality by descent is linked to the law of each country and to the historical time at which each link in the family line was born, all conclusions should be compared at the official source: Nationality agency or diplomatic representative agency of the relevant country, with the date of search. What is true in one generation may not be true in the next generation within the same family.

For documents with complex historical elements, readers should consult with a licensed citizenship lawyer in that country, and consider searching the archives before committing to pursuing it. The Legation Times presents a neutral framework, without assessing the likelihood of success of any particular application.

Sources: Government of Vietnam: Law 79/2025/QH15 · Government of Ireland: Citizenship by birth or descent

The Legation Times writes its content from published documents; nothing here is legal, tax or investment advice. Spotted an error? Send a correction request; for content rights, send a takedown request.

← Back to updates

Read next

Dominica citizenship by investment: Six checks before funds move
Citizenship & Passports

Dominica citizenship by investment: Six checks before funds move

Dominica citizenship by investment: Six checks before funds move A new discounting allegation is not a finding of misconduct, but it is a reminder that price, agent status, project approval and the path of funds must be tested against official documents.
Malta judgment: When investor citizenship becomes a prohibited transaction
Citizenship & Passports

Malta judgment: When investor citizenship becomes a prohibited transaction

Malta judgment: When investor citizenship becomes a prohibited transaction Case C-181/23 placed an EU-law limit on how a member state may confer citizenship. For investors, the task is to identify what survives the judgment and Malta's amendments rather than accept a loosely described…
US naturalisation fee would rise to $1,330, and fee waivers would end
Citizenship & Passports

US naturalisation fee would rise to $1,330, and fee waivers would end

US naturalisation fee would rise to $1,330, and fee waivers would end The Department of Homeland Security has proposed raising the Form N-400 fee by 75% while abolishing both the reduced fee and the fee waiver. Comments close on 24 August 2026, and no effective date…
Nauru’s USD 90,000 headline: What a family actually pays
Citizenship & Passports

Nauru’s USD 90,000 headline: What a family actually pays

Nauru’s USD 90,000 headline: What a family actually pays The current fee schedule produces government totals of USD 102,700–125,700 across four modelled households, while leaving one point to verify about the legal basis for the year-end promotional deadline.
Argentina has a CBI framework, but no application date yet
Citizenship & Passports

Argentina has a CBI framework, but no application date yet

Argentina has a CBI framework, but no application date yet Two decrees created the legal route and review process, but the terms that determine a capital commitment—minimum investment, complete eligible categories and formal filing procedure—still await an Economy Ministry resolution.
EU phase-out request puts Caribbean CBI under June 2028 pressure
Citizenship & Passports

EU phase-out request puts Caribbean CBI under June 2028 pressure

EU phase-out request puts Caribbean CBI under June 2028 pressure Antigua and Barbuda says four other Caribbean states received similar letters, but the Commission’s request is not an effective programme closure or an EU visa suspension decision.